tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post7879516099453967611..comments2023-06-05T08:35:46.872-07:00Comments on Java 2 Go!: A comprehensive XML processing benchmarkAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05439924633149516920noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post-4916283748000390202008-07-12T19:48:00.000-07:002008-07-12T19:48:00.000-07:00try vtd-xmlhttp://vtd-xml.sf.netyou won't regrettry vtd-xml<BR/>http://vtd-xml.sf.net<BR/>you won't regretanon_anonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14424619310452413715noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post-77598134884622788832008-05-07T04:12:00.000-07:002008-05-07T04:12:00.000-07:00Thank you Tatu. That's very interesting info indee...Thank you Tatu. That's very interesting info indeed.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05439924633149516920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post-48514573429253180472008-05-06T22:55:00.000-07:002008-05-06T22:55:00.000-07:00Hi Eduardo! Thank you for the interesting article....Hi Eduardo! Thank you for the interesting article. I was happy to also see a reference to StaxMate. One minor note wrt StaxMate: although it does use Stax2 extension, it also implements wrappers, so theoretically any other Stax (1.0) implementation should work as well. I have not extensively tested this, but I would expect Sun's sjsxp implementation (part of JDK 1.6) to work as well as Woodstox.<BR/><BR/>Also, another brand new Stax implementation, Aalto (http://www.cowtowncoder.com/hatchery/aalto/index.html) might be interesting to check out. While it is work-in-progress, it does implement Stax well enough to work with JAXB 2, and it is very very fast (50% higher throughput than Woodstox) at least in my test cases.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02343617472112278520noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post-84033009980483725662008-04-26T07:10:00.000-07:002008-04-26T07:10:00.000-07:00Well Matt,It certainly seems very impressive. Howe...Well Matt,<BR/><BR/>It certainly seems very impressive. However, our intention here was to compare only open-source, industry-standard compliant solutions. An exception was made to Oracle XDK because this blog is about Oracle technologies too - although you can clearly see that Oracle XDK didn't show the best results.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, your post is published, so readers are free to try Intel's XML kit if they want to.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05439924633149516920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6871409708513245659.post-50093867516231079622008-04-25T21:08:00.000-07:002008-04-25T21:08:00.000-07:00Hey Eduardo, Cool post and looks you are doing som...Hey Eduardo, <BR/><BR/>Cool post and looks you are doing some pretty solid research on XML performance. I have some experience with XML performance issues - I work on Intel's XML software team. I hate when posters on blogs use it for a sales pitch so I won't try to sell you on it but if you are intersted in high performance, check it out. I can promise you'll be pleasently surprised. See,<BR/><BR/>http://www.intel.com/software/xmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com